Learning by Doing
Today's advanced Large Language Model (LLM) technologies, such as OpenAI o3, Google Gemini-2.5 Pro, and DeepSeek-R1, have revolutionized the way we learn, and are best suited for "learning by doing" — a hands-on experience that prioritizes practical experiments. The method is superior to the traditional theory-first approach. At the heart of this approach is the importance of working on a meaningful project—one that sparks passion, excites curiosity, and motivates us to dive in and see it through to completion.
Students must form teams of five members by Week 3 and select a team leader. The team will independently take on a Deep Learning (DL) project that both excites and challenges them, with minimal supervision. The team leader will be responsible for submitting all group materials, including the member list, project proposal, and final report. This structure encourages collaboration, initiative, and ownership of the learning process.
Taking an existing dataset and adapting an existing method to make it your own DL method. You modify parameters, work with existing neural networks, apply what you've learned in the lecture, and aim to make them more efficient.
Challenge the state-of-the-art using algorithms without DL or with DL algorithms that aim to surpass this baseline. Compare the results and demonstrate the ability to outperform the baseline, referred to as "beat".
By selecting a research paper, the goal is to demonstrate how to outperform the current state-of-the-art papers. It's important to note that due to the rapid pace of paper publication, it might be difficult to stay up-to-date with the latest advancements. Nonetheless, the objective is to select a recent paper as a baseline and attempt to beat it.
A 5-page project proposal (not including references) submitted in PDF format to CANVAS.
Required Content:10-minute PowerPoint presentation to the entire class assessing communication skills and technical understanding.
Presentation must include:Minimum 25-page final report following technical report structure.
Required Submissions:Template Technical Report: Use this technical report template with LaTex. Must include Appendix A for individual contributions assessment.
Group 2:
YU Zhen (Team Leader),
Zhai Fanshun,
Xie Honghao,
Luo Juyuan,
Liu Pei
Group 3:
Chunxi Li(Team Leader),
Lishuoguang Yu,
Wenlong Li,
Jingtong Ma,
Hongle Wu
Group 4:
Zhou Dianqi (Team Leader),
Chen Siyuan,
Chu Ka Po,
Dai Lixuan,
Wang Jiawei
Group 5:
LIU WEI (Team Leader),
MA Dingcheng,
LI Zilin,
ZHENG Canjie,
LU Xinchi
Group 6:
Jialiang Jiang (Team Leader),
Can Liu,
Weixin Wang,
Gaozhan Kang,
Wenlan Ma
Group 7:
Han Yilin (Team Leader),
Pan Siyu,
Lan Murong,
Li Zhaokun,
Cheng Lijun
Group 8:
PENG Dingyuan (Team Leader),
ZHAI Yuxuan,
XU Yifeng,
LU Chenxi,
YANG Ruiming
Group 9:
Bocheng Lin (Team Leader),
Qiushi Gu,
Yuanman Liu,
Maoshen Li,
Zeyi He
Group 11:
Qizhen Tang (Team Leader),
NUERMAIMAITI Adilai,
Jing li,
Ziheng Lu,
Xuyang Huang
Group 12:
YANG Jiayi (Team Leader),
YAO Liyun,
HAN Qiuchi,
ZHANG Yuelin,
LIN Hanwen
Group 13:
LI Xingyao (Team Leader),
HE Weiyu,
LI Xiaojing,
WANG Xuefei,
REN Yujie
Group 14:
Liu Guanlong (Team Leader),
Zhang Huiyang,
Peng Yusu,
Liu Yuheng,
Guo Fuzheng
Group 15:
ZHAO Pengbo (Team Leader),
BAI Keyi,
WANG Jingru,
PAN Yangchen,
GUO Huangang
Group 16:
Ge Yuting (Team Leader),
Guo Wenjie,
Liang Yongkang,
Yan Yincheng,
Tian Qixin
Group 17:
XU Ziao (Team Leader),
LIU Ziang,
Wang Zihan,
Xue Yangdian,
Mao Chenyang
Group 18:
Shi Jiarui (Team Leader),
Shi Chenxu, Chen Boyong, Shang Depei, Li Yuanjing
Group 20:
LI Huanrong (Team Leader),
PANG Bo,
ZHANG Huanyu,
CHEN Junxu,
Zhang Yangqi
Group 21:
Group 22:
Group 23:
Group 24:
Group 25:
Group 26:
Group 27:
Group 29:
Group 30:
Group 31:
Group 32:
Group 33:
Group 34:
Group 35:
Group 36:
Department of Electrical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong